An Important Note From the Seer Regarding Belvaspata
The Seer:
My dear Lightfamily, I was somewhat surprised when, after years of being instructed to the contrary, I received the very clear message that Belvaspata practitioners may now do long distance Belvaspata initiations for those desiring to partake of its holy blessings.*
However, it is very important that the proper protocols for these holy tools are followed and that one does not presume to overstep the boundaries of what is permissible, and what is not.
It is not permissible to do Belvaspata treatments or sessions long distance for groups. The long distance Belvaspata session must only be done for one person at a time. If you do the long distance Belvaspata for a group, as with all misused holy tools, you invite adversity into your practice and confusion into your life. Belvaspata should not be done for others through a mass-produced recording, because the practitioner is part of the holy alchemy that takes place, involving the client, the Angelgod, and the practitioner.
I appreciate your commitment to help maintain the purity of this most sacred gift bestowed on us by the Infinite One. Approach your role as practitioner with the utmost humility, and prepare for your interaction with a client by reminding yourself that it is an unspeakable privilege to be a servant of the Most High.
Thank you, Ciara, for asking these questions. The instructions on BVP ARE unclear.
Some more points that hopefully we can gain clarity around:
– It has previously been stated that group work was considered a "blessing" rather than a "healing", and that the ideal protocol for this is Kaanish
Eg. as in this post – https://www.alminediary.com/how-belvaspata-healing-differs-from-blessings/
Is it possible that Almine was referring the whole time to IN-PERSON group work and that it was simply never specified that long-distance was not allowed?
Or has this previous statement now simply changed?
Or, did she mean in the post above to state that HEALING SESSIONS for groups are not allowed (general blessings still fine)?
And, assuming that there is not just something simple missing from the above post…
– In the event where, for instance, a Spiritual Journeys hosted gathering has included live Kannish online, is it that the THEME/intention of elevation of the Original Ones as proxy is what was being focused on, rather than the "group" of the Original Ones/participants in the live event?
If so, it has always been the instinct of quite a few of us to do group work this way it seems (as otherwise it feels chaotic, plus it states clearly in the manual that this is proxy work) – however, the wording stated in instruction we have received in various places has definitely been somewhat confusing.
Eg. this post where Almine stated "do Kaanish daily for the children" – https://www.alminediary.com/a-call-to-action-for-our-lightfamily/
Given that Beloved Almine will be stepping way and many devoted ones will be required to carry the torch of this sacred work, would it be wise to have some kind of gold standard training available that explicitly outlines more advanced alchemical understand and nuances that we may now have the maturity to grasp in a different way?
thank you dear Ciara for posting the link for how BVP healing differs from blessings. This helped me understand better what Almine is saying in the post.
Some more points that hopefully we can gain clarity around:
– It has previously been stated that group work was considered a "blessing" rather than a "healing", and that the ideal protocol for this is Kaanish
Eg. as in this post – https://www.alminediary.com/how-belvaspata-healing-differs-from-blessings/
Is it possible that Almine was referring the whole time to IN-PERSON group work and that it was simply never specified that long-distance was not allowed?
Or has this previous statement now simply changed?
– In the event where, for instance, a Spiritual Journeys hosted gathering has included live Kannish online, is it that the THEME/intention of elevation of the Original Ones as proxy is what was being focused on, rather than the "group" of the Original Ones/participants in the live event? Or the practitioner only focusing on themselves as proxy for all?
If so, it has always been the instinct of many of us to do group work this way it seems, for multiple reasons including that it otherwise feels chaotic plus it is stated clearly in the manual the nature of proxy work – however, the wording stated in instruction we have received in various places has definitely been somewhat confusing.
Eg. this post where Almine stated "do Kaanish daily for the children" – https://www.alminediary.com/a-call-to-action-for-our-lightfamily/
Given that Beloved Almine will be stepping way and many devoted ones will be required to carry the torch of this sacred work, would it be wise to have some kind of gold standard training available that explicitly outlines more advanced alchemical understand and nuances that we may now have the maturity to grasp in a different way?
Hi dear Almine, Is it ok to gather as a group online and for each participant to do Bvp together at the same time, as a proxy for all of life? Is it also ok, in the same setting as an online gathering to do Kaanish Bvp as a blessing for a particular situation? Finally, is it ok if the gathering is recorded for other OO Bvp practitioners to join later and actively participate? With much love and gratitude for this most holy and sacred tool of the Infinite, Joanne
Thank you Beloved Almine for your update. Please would we be able to clarify the distinction between what is stated here and the situation where, for years, many members of our Lightfamily have hosted remote offerings where participants may state that they would like to be included in the healing?
This seems to have occurred often within the Lightfamily community itself, well aside from individuals doing the same.
Has this been done incorrectly the whole time, or are many of us misunderstanding something here?
Or has this simply changed?
Further, please could be clarify when the situation when doing a remote healing for say a group that we do not know the individuals components of (eg. children in Syria)?
What is the difference here?
Is the situation of working with a generic group consciousness a different scenario?
Is it perhaps that when working on a "group" (such as children in war-stricken zones, as instructed by Almine), that we are focusing on the proxy issue and not the group itself?
Either way, further clarification of the precise nuances here would be deeply deeply appreciated so that we may all hold this sacred tool in the precise way that it is intended to be stewarded.
Having listened to many of those Belvaspata radio show sessions my question is how do we remove the disruption that that participation will have caused?
Good to know. Alwyas check with Jan Alvey if you have any questions.
Does the distinction between a healing for an individual and a blessing, which I believe was acceptable, for a group still hold true?
Thank you for this very important clarification about our Sacred gift of Belvaspata.
In the interest of further clarity:
What about where Almine has requested Belvaspata for conflict zones, children etc
What about where a group gathers on Zoom or similar, and Belvaspata is done by one of those present for a specific intention of the group, or to bless those present as a proxy for all life?
'If you do the long distance Belvaspata for a group, as with all misused holy tools, you invite adversity into your practice and confusion into your life." – The Seer
It's an interesting point. Which leads me to question? …does one potentially also attract adversity or confusion into their life if they dialogue with a collective audience? Because I don't actually know who I am talking too, and how they will interpret, use, and understand my words.
Or just stop talking, since it rarely really has anything to do with the post in question anyway.
True!
So the Levels 1-5 of Kaanish BVP from Blog Talk Radio radio program many many years ago (which is a down loadable file) can not be used by anyone…..
Thank you for this most important information.