Rogier:
Some believe that planet Earth can carry way more people than we currently have. And so my question is what you mean when you say 'overpopulation'?
The Seer:
More people than current water sources, oil, and arable land can sustain.
Previous: Happy St. Patrick's Day
Next: The Black Mink
I have high hopes that everyone reaches that 100th monkey point quite sooner than many expect⦠where the majority accept, embrace, and actually really prefer to live their life in fullness without needing electricity / gas / iron ore / diamonds etc, the earth would surely sing her highest notes in a majesty we haven't seen on a large scale before.
The way of life that springs to my mind is the relationship the Aboriginal people here had as they lived. They were living a godhood of their own, all of mother earths resources used lovingly them given back. Earths resources suppprtimg them symbiotically. Much much more at one with the earth. Telepathy between each other, sacred ceremonies and dances, decentralised range of small tribes, living according to the song of that part of country, they had many languages (hundreds, I think thousands), it sounds familiarβ¦ π€©
They, to me, are a pure expression of what we will
Return home to.
There was no unnecessary destruction before they were invaded, separated, enslaved and murdered. I look forward to living a version of this life on earth that will be bigger, more refined and exciting.
This could make a lot of sense in regards to the feelings Ive had about the term; sustainable vs unsustainable variables based on how things are currently presenting, and I could feel conflicted by feeling the perfection that lies underneath (whatever that would look like). A complex yet fascinating topic. Thank you for this!
Good point.